Ask plain questions across your own ILI runs, dig reports, and integrity-management records — the controlling code (API 1160/1163, 49 CFR Part 192), the damage mechanism, the prior anomaly — each answer traced to the exact page. Lead apps: ILI Expert and Dig Expert. Runs air-gapped on your own hardware.
Integrity teams who carry the consequence of a wrong disposition — and the hours of digging behind every defensible one.
Own the integrity-management program and the dig decisions that come out of it.
Turn inline-inspection runs into prioritized features, digs, and repairs.
Keep the program records audit-ready and traceable to the controlling code.
It lives across ILI runs, dig sheets, alignment sheets, MOCs, and a stack of codes — in different systems, in different formats.
API 571 lists roughly 70 mechanisms, and which code is controlling depends on your service and jurisdiction. The answer is real — it is just buried.
You know the answer is somewhere — in a run report, a prior dig, the federal code, or a decades-old test record — but not which one, or where.
Decades of “why we dug there” and “what that anomaly really was” never made it into a system. When they leave, it leaves.
knowledgeXpert ships as focused apps built on your own ILI runs, dig records, codes, and SOPs — each one returns a cited answer or a defensible deliverable.
Ask across your inline-inspection runs — features, growth, prior calls — and get a cited answer tied to the run report and joint, not a web guess.
Pull the dig criteria, the prior excavation, and the disposition logic for a feature, each step cited to your own records and the controlling code.
Narrow the ~70 API 571 mechanisms to what applies in your service, with the controlling API 1160/1163 or 49 CFR 192 clause cited.
Plain questions across ILI runs, dig reports, MOCs, and inspection history — cited answers in seconds, not file cabinets.
Before you load a single record, knowledgeXpert ships with cited public integrity knowledge on the Marketplace — so you’re never assessing an anomaly from a blank box.
3,900+ pages of federal incident investigations — whether a feature or failure mode has shown up before, and what the investigation found, cited to the report.
The pipeline-integrity body of knowledge — B31G / RSTRENG, anomaly assessment.
The federal pipeline-safety code, cited to the controlling clause.
The agency’s own analyses and pipeline-safety data, ready to query.
Your ILI runs and dig records come in alongside — so you can ask whether an anomaly or failure mode has appeared in PHMSA incidents, and get the findings cited next to your own data.
Thirty minutes, a slice of your own ILI runs and dig records, and you see the citations before anyone signs anything.